Intro
- Intro
- Quality
- Samples
- Verdict
The 24-105mm f4 OS is Sigma’s second full-frame lens in its Art-series which (quote Sigma) “offers sophisticated optical performance and abundant expressive power to deliver faithfully on your artistic vision”. Blimey.
The first full-frame Art lens was the 35mm f1.4 DG HSM which put in some astonishing performance in the corners of the full-frame sensor (see my Sigma 35mm f1.4 review). So expectations for the new zoom are high regarding optical performance and also build-quality. A focal range from 24mm to 105mm makes it a very practical zoom for full-frame bodies covering a pretty wide angle of view up to a light tele-photo reach.
The lens is available for Nikon, Canon, Sony (w/o image stabilization), and Sigma DSLRs and Sigma offers a unique conversion service should you switch your preference for bodies from say Canon to Nikon. Just send your Art lens in to Sigma-service and they can convert the mount to your preferred new one. The lens is priced around 900 USD / 800 EUR which puts Sigma’s offering below Nikon’s 24-120/4.0G VR at 1000 EUR but clearly above Canon’s EF 24-105mm 4.0 L IS USM which currently sells at around 800 EUR. Conversion service for this lens costs around 200 EUR which seems like a small price to pay considering the cost of a new lens. In my review I’ll put Sigma’s Art 24-105mm f4 DG OS HSM zoom to the test on a Nikon D800 to see how the lens performs on todays highest resolution full-frame DSLR.
 |
Тема: Полнокадровый объектив Sigma Art 24-105mm F4 DG OS HSM
Автор реплики: WingfirE
Очень многие забывают об одном свойстве сигм — их эргономика скопирована с эргономики кэноновских объективов, а не никоновских. Получаем — зум и кольцо фокусировки вращаются в непривычную сторону. Для владельцев парка никоновской оптики, особенно если уже есть привычка, подобное управление раздражает. Одно дело, когда идет речь о фиксах, с зумами намного сложнее.
Автор реплики: Игорь К.
Купил это стеклышко. Очень доволен.Имею постоянный доступ к никон 24-70/2,8,поэтому есть с чем сравнивать. Надеюсь, со временем не выскочит каких-либо технических недорозумений
Автор реплики: Mike_P
Достоинства: Резкий в центре кадра с 4, на Д800Е пробивает до муара. Макс. резкость на 36 Мп ФФ где-то на 5.6, на 8 уже заметна дифракция. Стабилизатор ОЧЕНЬ хорош: тихий, эффективный. 105 мм и 1/6-1/8 с вполне держит
Резкий на бесконечности, что важно в пейзажной съемке.
Недостатки: Уголки кадра мажет даже на диафрагме 8. Кому-то м.б
критична дисторсия.
Хороший тревел-штатник и объектив для обычных жанровых (бытовых) съемок даже для 36 Мп ФФ. Углы кадра требуют контроля, особенно при пейзажной съемке. Оказался неожиданно резким уже с диафрагмы 4. При покупке все же надо проверять АФ и резкость, т.к. возможен разброс качества, сейчас это у всех производителей. Поставил бы 4 за менее резкие углы кадра, но при его цене и диапазоне в сравнении с 24-70/2.8 итоговая оценка все же 5.
Тема: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS — кому-то это надо… ТЕПЕРЬ И ОПРОС!
Ресурс: Клуб Foto.ru
Форум: Цифровые зеркальные фотоаппараты
Автор реплики: Алексей014
Минусы объектива: довольно сильная виньетка на 24-35 с открытой. (ФФ) которая в общем то правится, но на некоторых сценах не полностью получается убрать. Большой вес и большой размер фильтра. Хотя конечно это такие минусы, очень индивидуальные. То есть кто то их будет считать минусами, а кто то плюсами. Картинка, которую выдаёт это стекло очень нравится. Фокусируется моментально. (по крайней мере на 5DMlll) Лучше него только фиксы да и то не все.
Автор реплики: trafik78
пишут, что корпус из особого пластика, хотя по ощущениям — ну, точно металл.
Но если пластик, то почему такой холодный.. Вот хобот явно пластиковый, но он и теплый..
Автор реплики: SergeyAn
Это тонкие обечайки из консервной банки — вот и холодные. Но быстро прогреваются, под ними пластик.
А ветки тут две по этому объективу… Плохо искали. Вверх посмотрите правее барахолки есть сообщества, там сигма и в том разделе есть и данный объектив.
Самое главное его преимущество это , что посветлее… Из- за больших светопотерь в L -ке реальная светосила не F4, а 5,1
А в сигме реально 4,2!
Focus, build quality, and image stabilization
Focus accuracy and repeatability is critical to consistently produce sharp shots. Repeatability (the accuracy of focus on the same subject after repeated focus-acquisition) of this lens is excellent with no outliers over a series of 40 shots. And there is no performance variation whether the lens focuses coming from infinity or from minimum focus distance. The lens mostly focuses very fast at around 0.5 sec from infinity to 1m. But sometimes it overshoots the target and hunts a bit but still manages to find focus in a round 0.7 seconds.
The lens’ AF can be fine-tuned with Sigma’s Optimization Pro software that also doubles up as a way to update the firmware of the lens. You get a total of 16 individual points to fine-tune AF: for 24mm, 50mm, 70mm, and 105mm focal length and for distances of around 45cm, 0.9m, 2m, and infinity. Just put the lens in the USB-dock and tune away. Unfortunately there was no time during my test period to try-out this unique tool.
The focus ring has no slack/play between its movement and the focus-action and a throw of around 90 degrees, which is a bit short at the long end for accurate focus wide open. The focus ring is extremely small with only 6.5m of rubberized surface but movement is pretty smooth as is the zoom action. Both the focus-ring and the zoom-ring turn the same way as Canon zooms. Unfortunately that is the opposite direction to what Nikon users have come to expect. AF-operation is pretty quiet on the outside, and if you record video with the built-in microphone focus-movement produces only a slight “clack” at the start of the movement and little other noises. The operation of the image-stabilization is inaudible.
Shaking the lens does produce some noise. But apart from that the general impression of build quality is pretty high: A high quality metal/plastic construction and nine rounded aperture blades. And the double-barrel zoom design can only be moved slightly from side to side when fully extended to 105mm focal length.
To test the effectiveness of the image stabilization I did a series of over 140 controlled test-shots hand-held at 105mm focal length. Around half of those were with OS=OFF at 1/100 of a second and the other half was with OS=ON and shutter-speeds that were 4 – 8 times slower. After rating the sharpness of those images at 100% magnification on a scale from 0 to 5 I compared the samples with shorter shutter speeds and OS=OFF to those samples with longer shutter-speeds and OS=ON. I can report that the OS is good for around 3 stops of stabilization, that is the set of shots at 1/12 sec were on average as sharp as the set of shots at 1/100 sec. This is a very good result and makes the images stabilization of this lens a very useful feature.
Now it’s time to check out the results in my Sigma 24-105mm f4 OS quality and Sigma 24-105mm f4 OS sample images pages, or if you’d like to skip to chase, head straight for my verdict!
Pages: 1
Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DC OS HSM | Art lens test data
Here we’re showing DxOmark’s lens test data for the Canon-mount version of the Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DC OS HSM on both the full frame EOS 5D Mark III and the APS-C EOS 7D, along with a quick summary of the main findings. We’re also showing a quick comparison to its Canon equivalent, the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM.
Click on any of the images or links below to open our interactive lens widget, and explore the data further
1) Tested on Canon EOS 5D Mark III
The Sigma 24-105mm F4 is designed to be used on full frame cameras, on which it offers an extremely useful wideangle to short telephoto zoom range. It’s a pretty impressive performer too, producing excellent sharpness right across the frame wide open at all focal lengths. Indeed there’s barely any change in measured sharpness between F4 and F11.
Chromatic aberration is a bit high — there’s some obvious blue/yellow fringing at wideangle, and red/cyan at telephoto. Vignetting is also quite strong, with a precipitous drop-off in brightness towards the corners of the frame at either end of the zoom range when shooting at F4; however it clears up on stopping down to F5.6. Distortion is also quite pronounced, with 2.7% barrel at 24mm, and 2.4% pincushion from 70mm to 105mm. But to be fair, none of this is really any worse that we’d expect from a 4x zoom on full frame.
2) Tested on Canon EOS 7D
On APS-C cameras like the EOS 7D, the lens offers a zoom range equivalent to 38-168mm on full frame, which isn’t necessarily an obvious choice for general-purpose use. However the 24-105mm still performs pretty well in terms of sharpness, giving very good results across the frame at almost all settings. It’s weakest wide open at telephoto, but improves markedly on stopping down to F5.6.
Chromatic aberration is a little high, especially at wideangle where blue/yellow ringing is likely to be very visible towards the edges and corners of the frame. There’s also some red/cyan fringing at the tele end. However, as usual for a full frame lens used on APS-C, distortion and vignetting are both pretty low, with just a little barrel distortion at wideangle.
3) Compared to the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
The main rival for the 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM in Canon mount is the similarly-specified EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, which was announced back in 2005 alongside the original EOS 5D. Here we’re comparing the two on full frame.
The test data shows that the Sigma and Canon have rather similar characteristics. The Sigma edges out its older rival for wide open sharpness towards the long end, although any visible difference is likely to disappear at F5.6. It also has a bit less barrel distortion at wideangle. Against this, the Sigma shows more pronounced vignetting at telephoto. The biggest difference in these tests is transmission: despite the same f/4 maximum aperture, the Sigma passes about half a stop more light.
Alternatives
– I’ve already mentioned the Canon EF 24-105mm 4.0 L IS USM (see Gordon’s Canon 24-105mm f4 review) which offers similar features plus greater sealing at a slightly lower price and the Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4.0G VR (see my Nikon 24-120mm f4 review) which has a 14% longer reach but also costs a bit more.
– There are also shorter alternatives: for Nikon bodies there’s the Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G VR (see my Nikon 24-85VR review) which can be had for less than 450 EUR. Or if you prefer the 24-70mm range, there’s an f2.8 Nikkor for Nikon bodies, or both f2.8 and f4 versions for Canon’s bodies.
– Or you consider going longer with a Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, a Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G VR (see my Nikon 28-300VR review) or a Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM which is a serious piece of gear not really comparable to the other lenses size-, weight-, and price-wise.
Facts from the catalog
As usual I’ll have a look at the technical data first. I’ve rated the features with a (or ), when it’s better than average or even state of the art, a if it’s standard or just average, and if there’s a disadvantage. I’ll compare it to Nikon’s AF-S 24-120/4.0G VR (which I’ll simply call “the Nikon”) and “the Canon” EF 24-105/4.0 L IS USM in this section.
Size (diam. x length): 89 x 109 mm (3.5 x 4.3 in) w/o lens-hood which is a little larger than the Canon or the Nikon. But on a full-frame body this lens still has a nice size.
Weight: 885 g (31.2 oz.). This is pretty hefty esp. compared to the Canon at only 670g. The Nikon weighs 710g. but it adds to the impression of a solid build.
Optics: 19 elements in 14 groups. That’s in the same ball-park as the competition with 17/13 or 18/13 lenses/groups. But 14 groups have 28 air/glass-surfaces that produce a lot of opportunities for flares and ghosts. I’ll test how prone the lens is to internal reflections. The cross-section shows 7 aspherical or (extra-)low dispersion elements.
Closest focus distance/max. magnification: 0.45 m (1.5 ft.) / 1:4.6. In my test I was able to get down to 1:4.3. The Canon and Nikon equivalents offer similar reproduction ratios which comes in quite handy.
Filter-thread: 82mm. So you probably need to get a new set of filters. Canon and Nikon take 77mm filters which are standard on today’s professional lenses.
Image stabilization: Yes, just like the Canon and the Nikon. At these focal lengths image stabilization really helps a lot.
Auto focus: HSM (hyper sonic motor), so it works on DSLR-bodies that don’t have an AF-motor built in like Nikon’s D3x00 and D5x00 series, and also offers manual-focus override by turning the focus ring. The Canon and Nikon offer that too.
Covers full frame/FX or smaller = very good, same as the Nikon and the Canon.
Price: around 800 EUR new (incl. 19% VAT) = not as cheap as the Canon but cheaper than the Nikon.
Comes with a nice semi-soft lens-case that is well padded but has no strap, rear and front lens-cap are included.
Distance information is relayed to the camera, so a Nikon body can do all the advanced exposure-related stuff with this lens e.g. with the system flash.
Aperture ring: No, just like all competitors.
Sealing: No. The Canon and Nikon are sealed at the lens-mount.
The score in the “features-department” is 1/7/5. The minus-point being the large filter thread. All-in-all the feature set looks OK with a 4.4x zoom, constant f/4.0 aperture and image stabilization being the most important features of this lens, but it’s also lacking the sealing of the Canon and Nikon alternatives.