Тема: светосильный фикс для помещений, в лимитированном бюджете 
Ресурс: Club Nikon
Форум: Оптика для фотокамер Nikon
Автор реплики:
наверное, единственный приемлемый вариант — 35 /2. фокусное в самый раз «для ближнего боя», светосилы в принципе достаточно, рисунок хорош, стоит б/у примерно те самые 8 тыр.
Автор реплики: Andres
Я бы присмотрелся к 35/2. Нормальный объектив, кто бы там его не ругал. Звезд с неба конечно не хватает, но свою цену отрабатывает на 100%.
А на счет полтинника, ни чуть он не длинноват на кропе, хотя дело сугубо индивидуальное. Самое то для портретов и натюрмортов. Только брать нужно тот, который 1.4
Автор реплики: Genn
Мне Никкор 35/2 очень нравится. Разрешающая способность у него меньше, чем у того же 18-135, но более естественная, не акцентированная. Опять же — фотографическая широта светового потока, достигающего матрицы получается намного больше. Удобно снимать в условиях слабой освещенности — вечером, в музеях.
Автор реплики: july
раньше 35/2 как раз ну ооочень хвалили, прямо чуть что — посылали к нему . Сам имею такой — нормальный объектив, весьма хороший даже… Так что это все веяния в инете.. сегодня кто—то ляпнул что плохое и все подхватили
Руководство по покупке хорошего объектива Nikon
Тема: Подарок на новый год себе любимому. (nikon 35/2 or 50/1,4)
Ресурс: Клуб Foto.ru
Форум: Обсуждение фототехники
Автор реплики: Арчи Кун
Если не будет ярких источников света в кадре, то 35/2 вполне сгодится. Рисунок допольно приятный. Однако хроматические аберрации могут быть очень сильны. Например, фары автомобилей сопровождаются яркой синей аберрацией, а чуть менее ярких фонарей — пурпурной. Это в случае, если источник света занимает очень мало места в кадре. Я уже зарекся снимать им вечерние улицы. Предпочитаю 17-55/2.8 — у него ХА пока не заметил. 50/1.4 не пользовался, не знаю.
У меня жанрово-прогулочным является 17-55, а 35/2 только в редких случаях. Неожиданно для себя я вдруг выяснил, что такая бандура, как 17-55, почти не вызывает интереса у окружающих. Видимо считают это таким же естественным явлением, как фонарный столб. А с любительской камерой с китом косых взглядов не оберешься.
Автор реплики: niklens
35/2 на макс дырке снимать позволяет, но рисунка не имеет. Другое дело, что 35/2 до 2.8 имеет и рисунок пластичней-приятней и угол более жанрово-ходовой.
Я с удовольствием пользую и 35/2 и 17-55/2.8
Только зум беру на конкретные съемки, а 35/2 на «погулять и в гости». Идеален компактностью и углом для ростовых и групповых портретов на кропе, ИМХО.
Дырку при портретах, правда, все равно зажимать до 2.8 приходится, иначе портится боке.
Но пластичность картинки (35/до2.8 ) в результате лучше, чем у 17-55 в самом итоге.
Тема: Nikkor 40/2.8 vs 35/1.8 — Для D3100
Автор реплики: olegpan
А мне 35/1,8 неожиданно понравился.
Начитался хреновых отзывов, долго не брал
А зря.
Что увидел — разрешает 24 Мп Д7100, начиная с открытой, максимальная резкость на 5,6.
Резче, чем 50/1,8G до с открытой до дырки 5,6, дальше уже 50/1,8 резче.
ХА бывают — но значительные только при контровом свете, типа солнца в объективе, в остальном все прилично.
Насчет боке не буду говорить — для меня это не очень важно, я даже сравнить толком не могу. Да и фокусное не «бокешное», для этого нужны другие стекла.
П.С
также пробовал 35/2. Вот по нему негатив — 24 Мп он и на прикрытых не разрешает, на открытых мыло-мыльное. Возможно, такой образец, но еще раз пробовать не буду.
Тема: Масло на диафрагме nikkor 35/2
Ресурс: Club Nikon
Форум: Club Nikon> Фототехника> ОБЪЕКТИВЫ> Проблемы, поломка, уход (оптика)
Автор реплики: VAGUS
У 35/2Д масло в диафрагме — обычное дело. Там такой конструктив, что жидкая фракция масла через хлипенькую резиновую прокладочку со временем прёт на лепестки. Особенно, в тёплом климате. Я обычно делал как-то так:
1. Вынимаем стакан с линзами и диафрагмой.
2. Вынимаем спереди и сзади линзоблоки, чтобы стакан остался без стекла.
3. Моем в банке с Калошем, меняя бензин раз три-четыре. Полное погружение не нужно, достаточно омывания при встряхивании.
4. Сушим, собираем обратно.
В отличие от разбирания на отдельные лепестки либо чистки ватной палочкой снаружи, получаем отличный результат надолго.
Да, смазку менять надо на что-то типа ЦИАТИМа-221.
Тема: кто-нибудь использует Nikkor 35/2 на цифре как штатник?
Ресурс: Клуб Foto.ru
Форум: Обсуждение фототехники
Автор реплики: Егор Николаев
35mm великолепный объектив. Его без вопросов можно ставить как основной. Его хватает на сюжет, более менее на пейзаж, отлично рисует макро.
Портреты конечно не рекомендую.. но тоже можно — если снимать людей в интерьере.
Автор реплики: 6C4C
Мне неафтофокусный 35/2 нравится больше, чем 50/1.8. Если оптическая схема АФ 35/2 такая же, как и у МФ, то это отличный объектив.
Автор реплики: VAGUS
У меня 35/2 на плёнке. Отличнейший объектив! Рисунок среди Никкоров один из лучших. На близких дистанциях — тоже хорош.
Performance-
Focus
The close focus distance is 0.85 feet or 0.25 m.
The auto focus is very accurate and fast. I assume it’s because of the light weight of glass.
There is no AF motor in the lens so only mid range and above cameras can have the AF working for you. The lower level consumer cameras such as D5200, D3300 and D3200 lacking auto focus motor will not AF on this lens, on them one has to do with manual focusing only.
I found manual focus smooth and handy to use with enough span on the focus ring.
Sharpness
This piece of glass is simple in design and yet capable of giving decent sharp images.
#Courtesy Nikon
While using the lens on FX , I had to stop down the aperture to 2.8 and beyond to 5.6 for sharp pictures . This is not very pleasing performance but at f/8 , it is flawless. I have some of the best pictures from this lens shot at this aperture. Wide open at f/2 vignetting (reduced sharpness at corners) is visible on both FX or DX. This means pictures shot at widest aperture are not sharp in the periphery. I don’t shoot with that aperture for shallow depth of field on this lens, its better to opt for higher focal lengths like 50 mm or 85 mm for narrow depth of field, which will yield similar result without compromising on sharpness.
On the DX camera, the results were much better in terms of sharpness. This is because of its sharp sweet spot in the center. Stopping down aperture up to f/5.6 gives very sharp pictures .
Distortion
#Straight grid as seen by camera
There is moderate barrel distortion at wide angle f/2. I won’t bother about it much as I correct such things in post-processing. That’s why I invested in my $2000 PC so that I can compromise on such limitations, they are easily done away with the use of software technology. This saves me lot of money that I would have had to spend on more expensive lenses which would do the same thing anyway.
Also, the distortion on this lens is much lower than what we see on other lenses so it does not interfere in any practical use.
Chromatic aberration
No problem at wide angle. There is moderate lateral chromatic aberration ( color contrast shadows) on stopping down. This can be corrected in post processing.
Longitudinal chromatic aberration would render the neutral objects in far distance green and in near range blue. It is apparent in most observations and tricky to remove. But then this being a fast prime lens , I would accept the drawback.
Flares and ghosting
Flares are no problem in both the conditions of light source being in the frame and outside the frame. When the sun is not in frame there is a visible loss of contrast but nothing like flaring explicitly. So flaring is not an issue with this lens.
I did not encounter ghosting either.
Handling and autofocus
The lens is very light and compact and balances beautifully on all Nikon camera bodies I have tried it on. When mounted on bigger cameras such as the Nikon D700, the lens is completely unobtrusive and does not make your camera nose dive when you carry it on your shoulder, which makes it a great walk–around companion if 35mm is your preferred focal length.
Lens mount is metal; lens barrel, on the other hand, is made of high–quality plastics that, thankfully, do not give the lens a «plasticy» feel. Indeed, the lens has a certain heft to it and, due to this, leaves the impression of a solidly built optic. Filter thread is made of plastic, too; it does not rotate during focusing, which makes using a polarizing filter easy.
Autofocus speed will largely depend on the camera body used. On the Nikon D700, autofocus is very fast, accurate and nearly silent. The lens uses camera body’s AF motor for focusing and thus on Nikon’s lesser DX format cameras that do not have a lens drive (D40, D40x, D60, D3000 and D5000) can be used in manual focus only.
• Лучший объектив с фиксированным фокусным расстоянием
Bokeh
With 35mm lenses, you don’t get the same subject separation that you do with longer focal lengths. So I’m not looking to get a bunch of subject separation or crazy awesome bokeh when I’m using a 35mm prime.
In fact, I’m often stopped down to smaller apertures like f/5.6 or f/8 specifically for the purpose of bringing more of the scene into focus.
It’s definitely harder to photograph like this – you’re not throwing the background out of focus so you have to pay more attention to your compositions. But the results are totally worth it.
With that said, the Nikon 35mm f2D’s bokeh is fine. Most bokeh purists who only like the roundest of bokeh are probably going to tell you that the bokeh of this lens is jagged or “nervous” or whatever. And it’s certainly not as rounded as some other lenses.
But here’s the thing:
Lenses are photographic tools. And every tool is going to get you a different effect. As photographers, we should be choosing our tools according to the effect we’d like to achieve.
Where am I going with this?
The point is that sometimes, when the situation calls for it, we may want to choose a lens with a less circular bokeh or a lens with more or less contrast or for a million other reasons. We should choose our lenses for more meaningful reasons than just for bokeh.
Autofocus of the Nikkor 35mm – Surprisingly Snappy
Being as this Nikkor 35mm is an externally-focusing lens, I didn’t have high expectations for its autofocus speed.
But I was pleasantly surprised to find that the Nikon 35mm f2D has plenty of speed for the often-moving subjects that I shoot during my wedding photography. It’s not a speed demon like the 70-200 or the 24-70 but focuses at a very reasonable speed.
The best part?
Its accuracy is spot-on. It’s not like instantaneous focus but once you’ve placed your focus point on your subject, it does a really good job of focusing on what you want it to without it hunting.
In low-lit churches it has no problem acquiring focus and locking on.
The only time I’ve experienced it hunting back and forth is in very low light situations with no contrast to focus on.
Bokeh
Bokeh is normally not a major concern with wide–angle lenses. 35mm on a full–frame 35mm (FX) camera, however, is only moderately wide and considered by many (including yours truly) to be closer to «normal» or «standard» focal length than 50mm is said to be. Due to this, appearance of out–of–focus areas quite often might be very significant—indeed, I have taken a number of photographs with the lens where it was a very important factor.
 |
Bokeh is a very subjective criterion and you can see below for yourself what out–of–focus area marked in red in the test image above looks like at different apertures.
 |
 |
|||
|
f/2 |
f/2.8 |
|||
 |
 |
|||
|
f/4 |
f/5.6 |
In my opinion bokeh is somewhat harsh at f/2; it is fairly nice and unobtrusive in real–life photographs at f/2.8 and gets silkier as you further stop the lens down.
Build Quality/Ergonomics of the Nikon 35mm f2D
The barrel of the Nikon 35 f2 is made up of a polycarbonate plastic that has a very “plasticky” feel to it. It does NOT feel as durable as some of Nikon’s higher-end lenses.
Having said that, the build quality of the Nikon 35mm 2.0 really does not concern me. It feels pretty durable regardless of its plasticky feel.
The Nikon 35mm f2 focuses externally, so it has an inner tube that extends and retracts depending on what it’s focusing on. You would have to bang it up against something for it to matter, but external focusing lenses have an added element of fragility because of this.
There’s not a ton of lenses that are still produced that have aperture rings, but the Nikon 35mm f2 rocks it retro style. For newer cameras, you have the option of setting the aperture ring at f/22 and flipping a little switch on the side of the barrel of the lens, which locks it into place so that you can control your aperture in-camera, which is what I do.
This is the one minor buzzkill about the Nikon 35mm f2; the more moving parts on the outside of a lens, the more chances of one of them breaking.
On the other hand, the newer lenses with more complex designs are far more difficult to fix if something goes wrong. Older lenses with simpler designs like the Nikon 35mm f2D on the other hand, are a lot easier to fix without having to send it in to the manufacturer.
Тема: NIKKOR 35/2 AF D
Ресурс: Club Nikon
Форум: Оптика для фотокамер Nikon
Автор реплики: Senna
Оптическая схема у мануальных полтосов и автофокусных (с одинаковой светосилой конечно) совершенно одинакова. И как показал опыт Владимира Помогаева, который писал про него в форуме, разницы в картинке между ними нет. Это сказки тех, кто свято верит в преимущество мануальной оптики перед автофокусной. Вот в конструктиве разница есть, это да. Но конструктив в данном случае на картинку не влияет. Разве только на удобство ручной фокусировки. Если хочется действительно отличающейся картинки — надо взять полтос 1,2 Ais. Вот у него действительно картинка другая. Вот у тех мануальных объективов, оптическая схема которых отличается от таковой у автофокусных, действительно картинка может быть лучше. Но не факт. Но это к полтинникам, судя по всему, не относится. Их оптическая схема не менялась очень много лет.
Автор реплики: AndreyNN
Пользую AF35/2 около 4 лет, краткая оценка — 4 с плюсом. Маленький, быстрый, резкий. Одно НО — не нравится боке на 2-4. Стало быть, боке у него совсем нет. Поняв это, снимаю на гиперфокале — и доволен. Еще раз повторюсь, главные преимущества — вес, скорость и приемлимая картинка в зоне резкости на любой диафрагме. Хочется приятной размытости и объема (то есть вообще непонятно чего) — вот они — MF24/2 и MF35/1.4 — если вручную наводится нормально, то по картинке заметно приятней и более предсказуемы.
Sharpness
Centre: the lens is slightly soft at f/2 but centre sharpness noticeably improves at f/2.8; for all intent and purposes the lens is equally sharp from f/2.8 through to f/11. Diffraction becomes visible at f/16 and further takes its toll at f/22; I would avoid using the smallest aperture if sharpness is of crucial importance.
Corners are noticeably soft wide–open; corner sharpness gradually improves as the lens is being stopped down until it peaks at f/11; as expected, diffraction becomes evident at f/16 and further worsens sharpness at f/22.
Farthest corners are very soft from f/2 to f/5.6 and become acceptably sharp only at f/8; sharpness becomes comparable to that in the centre only at f/11 and then starts deteriorating at f/16 due to diffraction.
All things considered, the lens is very sharp if you use it right. For low light photography or when background is intended to be out–of–focus, the lens ideally should be used at f/2.8—at this aperture the main subject will be plentifully sharp and corner softness will in most circumstances be inconsequential as corners will be out of focus anyway. If corner–to–corner sharpness is needed, then the lens should be used at f/11. f/16 is perfectly usable if deeper depth of field is desired. Finally, I would avoid using the lens at f/22 because of diffraction.
Size/Weight of the Nikon 35mm f2
The size and weight of this little bad boy is what I really love about it.
Less than half a pound?
I’ll take that.
It has dimensions of 2.56 x 2.56 x 1.77 inches, or in other words: it’s small enough to put in a coat or jacket pocket, which is very important to me.
To put it in perspective, the next closest lens in Nikon’s lineup is the 35mm f/1.8, which is a full 100 grams heavier than the Nikon 35mm 2.0.
When you go from using the bulkier zoom lenses to a light and compact lens like the Nikon 35mm f2, it’s like the clouds parting after the storm.
Your level of comfort really affects your enjoyment of photography – and it’s much easier to enjoy when you’re more mobile and not weighed down by bulky gear.
Specifications-
Focal length
The 35mm focal length of this lens is most useful one on DX and FX format cameras equally. On FX format camera, it acts as a moderate wide angle glass. On DX format camera it gives the popular 50 mm field of view.
Since it is a FX lens it gives you just the sweet spot of the centre on crop sensor, and hence you see the best this lens can offer. That’s one reason why I shoot with this lens on my D7000.
Aperture
The maximum wide aperture is f/2. Such wide aperture allows for good low light performance. This also yields good “bokeh effect” where the subject is isolated from background by blurring the backdrop and foreground.
The minimum aperture goes down to f/22.
Diaphragm
There are seven regular diaphragm blades on Nikon 35 mm f/2 AF-D. It gives sharp sun-stars.
In a few batches of this lens, Nikon left some oil/lubricant on the diaphragm blade which became apparent with use. This problem has not been reported in new batches but such lenses are out there. I have been told, keeping the lens upright on its rear reduces the problem. Lucky me, my piece was free from this issue.
Barrel and rings
The build quality of the outer barrel feels solid in hand.
The small focus ring is in the front and allows smooth manual focus operation. This ring rotates during auto-focus operation, and it is highly recommended to stay clear of its path during AF to avoid damage to the lens. I find this a bit of nuisance. So I shoot manual with this lens, it gives me control and freedom to work on the other areas such as composition rather than dividing my attention on the position of my hand around the focus ring.
There are markings for depth of field scale and IR scale which are useful on the film camera.
Nikon 35 mm f/2 D AF has an aperture ring as I already mentioned.
Mount
We get a metal mount in this lens which gives sustainability to the lens especially for the people who indulge in changing lenses all the time. It survives rigorously long duration of wear and tear process. Though, I will not suggest lifting the camera by grabbing mounted lens.
Filter thread
It’s non rotating 52 mm plastic filter thread is desirable and ensures easy use of polarizing and graduated ND (natural density) filters. The 52mm filter size is a common denomination for Nikkor lenses these days.
Hood
The HN-3 screw-in metal hood is recommended model for this lens. It is not supplied in the kit , maybe because of the superior performance of the lens in flare control , you won’t need the hood anyway.
#Courtesy Nikon
There are 6 elements in 5 groups.
Size and weight
Nikon 35 mm f/2 D AF stretches 2.5 inches or 64.5 mm in diameter and 1.7 inches or 43.5 mm in length. Hence it is the smallest 35 mm lens in production.
This lightweight lens weighs approximately 205 grams or 7.5 oz.
Pixelarge Recommendation-
If i have to list the positives of Nikon 35 mm f/2 D AF they would be,
- It gives sharp images ;
- Versatility of use in DX , FX and film format cameras ;
- Light weight ;
- Classic design with depth of field scale ; and
- Durability .
Like every gear, this lens also has a few limitations.
- This lens expands and contracts while focusing which sucks dust in long run;
- Barrel distortion and chromatic aberration are there ; with
- Moderate bokeh delivery .
Please note that there have been cases of presence of oil on the diaphragm blades with some units and in worst cases that might hamper picture quality. To avoid that either go for a new legitimate product that comes with 5 year warranty or when buying used, inspect thoroughly.
So would I recommend this lens?
For Novices/ Beginners – This lens has the depth of field scale and IR markings, which are good learning steps for beginners, with use you will not need them in digital camera. In this regard this lens is a good stepping stone, gives the normal vision of 50 mm on the DX format camera and increased sharpness.
For Enthusiasts – If you are a DX user looking to upgrade to FX in coming years then purchasing this lens would keep it going for you even then. If that’s not on your agenda , then consider the cheaper dedicated DX version that has marginally better performance and significantly lower price.
For Pros- You must know when stopped down at f/4 both the 35 mm f/2 and 35 mm f/1.4G (the high end pro quality $1000 lens) give similar performance. So, if you are looking for a lens low on price, weight and size then the 35 mm f/2 AF-D is a five times cheaper alternative.
Prologue-
This lens is the grand old man of Nikon’s 35 mm line-up still holding its place amid the newbie glasses. It has a classic appearance with its markings and depth of field scale.
It is a prime lens, thus it is an obvious choice for capturing pictures in available light given its wide aperture.
The Nikon 35 mm f/2 D AF is a full format camera lens which doesn’t means that you can’t use it with your APS-C cameras (popularly called the DX format cameras). This lens works on most film cameras as well , since it has an aperture ring, which is not seen in newer variants. It can be a deciding factor for video shooter to opt this lens over the newer version for its flexibility to adjust aperture while shooting the video.
With new lenses being put up in market by the company, this isn’t my favorite piece of glass for my work. But it is a good optical design that is still doing rounds in the photography arena for its simplicity, versatility of use , and affordability in terms of money and space in your bag.
Ghosting/Flare
Even without Nikon’s Nano Crystal Coating (their magic fairy dust used reduce ghosting and flare), the Nikon 35mm f2D has practically zero ghosting.
And the flare that it has is the old-school attractive flare that I like – the type of cool flare that so many newer lenses are losing in the name of newer technology.
And while that technology has its place, I’m a real big fan of the look you can get from older lenses. Flare is one of them. Here’s another:
Sun stars.
Sun stars are those beautiful star-shaped suns that you get in photos when using older lenses. In photographers’ constant and obsessive quest to attain better and better bokeh by making aperture blades as rounded as possible, we lose the sun star aspect of photography. With newer lenses, if you include the sun in your frame it usually turns out like a big, shapeless blob.
Luckily, the Nikon 35mm f2D is here to save the day for sun stars.
Including the sun in the frame with the Nikkor 35mm 2.0 leaves you with beautiful, charming sun stars that can be used for artistic effect.
Тема: Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G FX
Ресурс: Club Nikon
Форум: Club Nikon> Фототехника> ОБЪЕКТИВЫ> Фиксы и мануальные объективы> Автофокусные фиксы
Автор реплики: olegpan
35/2 противопоказан для Д800. Я покупал его и пробовал на 7100 — негодная мыльная стекляшка, работает только на жирном пикселе Д600.
Автор реплики: AlexOu
старое 35 f\2 — маленький шумный кусок железа) хроматика и замыленные угла , в общем привычно характерные недостатки стекл D .
Автор реплики: goga68
мое мнение немного другое
35 f\2 — когда совсем нет денег но очень хочется фикс с этими фокусными
35 1.8G FX — для тех кто уже на явные косяки не готов , но денег по прежнему мало
сигма 35 /1,4 АРТ — для тех кто не только понимает что хочет , но и знает как … отличное сочетание цена-качество
35/1,4Ж — лучший из фиксов этих фокусных в системе … но цена … только ЦЕНА единственный ВРАГ этого стекла — в остальном это достойный представитель НИКОНа
из этого вывод — хочешь получать РЕЗУЛЬТАТ — готовь денежку … т.к. первые два варианта увы (((
по поводу серии Д могу сказать что 85 и 135 этой серии — лучшее что случилось у меня в фотографической жизни ))) хуже их видел много , лучше — нет …
Автор реплики: Sla007
я тоже в своё время думал о новой 35ке — но подвернулся Дэшный за копейки… снимаю на него 4й сезон свадьбы — и огромная статистика как следствие — Плюсы — мал, точен, резок , ещё раз — мало брака — даже в следящем с выключенным светом против света — на банкете … недостатки — типичные для этого стекла — жужжит) и Дождь… пришлось купить на него бленду + сделать защиту от ливня — иногда же приходится снимать.
Nikon 35mm f2D Sharpness
This is a sharp lens. Not the sharpest in the world but plenty sharp for my purposes, which is mostly wedding photography.
Wide open at f/2, it suffers quite a bit of softness in the corners. In terms of corner sharpness, the 35mm f/1.4 fares far better than the 35mm f2D. But that’s what should be expected for a lens that costs four times as much (but also took far longer than necessary to arrive on the market twenty years later.)
But I’m just not all that concerned with corner sharpness most of the time because most people looking at photos aren’t going to notice it.
Stop down to f/4 and smaller and you’re good to go – it gets a lot sharper across the frame.
Тема: Заменит ли никкор 17-55/2,8 фиксы?, Заменит ли никкор 17-55/2,8 фиксы 20/2,8 24/2,8/35/2,0/50/1,8?
Ресурс: Club Nikon
Форум: Оптика для фотокамер Nikon
Автор реплики: fishmonger
Добротный, хороший штатник на кроп. Но обвинить его в каком-то изысканном рисунке очень сложно. Можно сказать, что «скучный». Т.е. если делать выбор между топовым зумом и подобными фиксами, то в плюсе у 35/2 будут лишь габариты.
Ну вот я и держу 35/2 главным образом по массогабаритным причинам.
А если нужен красивый рисунок, наверное, неизбежно придется смотреть в сторону неавтофокусных фиксов.
Автор реплики: Genn
С удовольствием пользуюсь фиксами 24/2.8 и 35/2. Очень доволен рисунком и получаемой картинкой. Как-то лежит душа к этим фотографиям.
Опять же — фотоаппарт получается легкий. Можно пользоваться одной рукой — а второй, например, держаться за что-нибудь для страховки.
Автор реплики: Donnik
Согласен с fishmonger, 35/2 тоже использую только ради удобства. В остальном лично мне он не понравился, заменил его на зум Никкор 20-35/2,8.
Who would I recommend the Nikon 35mm f2D to?
If you shoot with Nikon full frame DSLRs, you really can’t go wrong with this lens. There are various reasons to keep it in your bag, whether as your primary 35mm or as a backup to something like the 35mm f/1.4.
I find the 35mm focal length incredibly natural to shoot with. It definitely has to do with the field of view being just slightly wider than that of the human eye. With 50mm lenses, I often wish I had more room to back up and get annoyed shooting them indoors because of how tight they are.
So because of the incredibly useful field of view you get with the 35mm focal length, I recommend the Nikon 35mm f2D to these folks:
- Casual Photographers Will Love it
If you’re the typical shutterbug who likes to photograph your family, friends, your kids, nature, things around the house or just life in general you’ll love this lens. For casual purposes, you don’t need to go and shell out a ton of money for a heavy lens that’s gonna weigh you down like the Nikon 35mm f/1.4. Besides, that lens may have better image quality but does it justify costing four times the price? My opinion is no, unless you make a living from photography.
- Wedding Photographers
This is my most used lens as a wedding photographer by far. The majority of my work is done with two camera bodies and two lenses. That’s it. I’ve got my Nikon 35 f2 on one side and an 85mm on the other. That way, when I’m up close to the action I’m ready with my 35. And if I’m far away or I want to enhance a smaller detail I whip out the 85. You don’t have time to change lenses.
Quick note: when I’m shooting the bride and groom getting ready before the ceremony, 90% or more of the time it’s with this lens. I’m often in cramped spaces like hotel rooms; I want to show multiple subjects interacting with each other and I just can’t do that with a 50mm – it’s just not wide enough. I started out shooting weddings with a 50mm but I had to get something wider. 35mm is just wide enough to not noticeably distort your subjects.
- Sports Photographers
The Nikon 35mm f2D can be used for situations in sports photography when you’re up close to the action. Think shooting your end of the court if you’re shooting from the baseline at a basketball game, shooting players being interviewed after the game from on the field, etc. Ideally for sports you’d be shooting with an uber fast-focusing lens that covers the 35mm focal length like the Nikon 24-70. However, the Nikon 35mm 2.0 is plenty capable for sports shooters on a budget.
- Landscape Photographers
In my opinion, every landscape photographer should have a 35mm lens or have the focal length covered by a zoom lens. When stopped down to smaller apertures, this Nikkor 35mm becomes very sharp – great for getting everything in focus in landscapes.
- Portrait Photographers
35mm is not a traditional focal length for portraits, and for good reason – the more rounded field of view is unflattering for human subjects. But as long as you’re not doing headshots, this lens will do an acceptable job of it. Just keep it to waist-up and full-body shots.
- Street Photographers
First off, if you’re still lugging around a bulky DSLR to do street photography then I’d recommend getting a lighter, smaller compact camera like one of the Fuji x100 cameras or my personal favorite, the Ricoh GR II. But if you’re going to use a DSLR, it’s best to go with the smallest and lightest lens possible. The Nikon 35mm f2D provides that, plus 35mm is a great focal length for street photography.